Health Canada guidelines based on thermal effects!

Health Canada admits Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation is based ONLY on thermal effects!

This latest article is from the website of Dr Madga Havas and was posted last week.

This is truly a Breakthrough…..

February 20, 2013.  I just returned from a hearing in Montreal in front of the Superior Court of Quebec where Health Canada scientist, James McNamee, admitted that the Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation (which includes radiation from most of the devices we are concerned about like mobile phones, cell phone antennas, Wi-Fi, wireless toys and baby monitors, smart meters etc.) is based ONLY on preventing a heating effect!

Let me state that again.  Health Canada admits that Safety Code 6 for frequencies between 100 kHz and 300 GHz are based ONLY on heating.

The remainder of this important article can be found here.

This entry was posted in Smart Meter. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Health Canada guidelines based on thermal effects!

  1. Eric says:

    Walking through Melbourne’s CBD today with EMR reader, I could see that the city is being absolutely irradiated with blankets of Electromagnetic Radiation from microwaves. This would be from many transmitting sources (all having their own transmitting frequencies) such as wi-fi, mobile phones etc. etc…..and maybe even smart meters if they have been installed in the CBD (I’m not sure). Every second person is now walking the CBD streets with a cell phone device of some type or other. My meter kicked up it’s radiation reading whenever I walked past or stood next to someone using a mobile device. So there is not just exposure to passive smoking but now definitely passive exposure to microwave radiation. Just casually walking the streets, readings of 1 milliwatt/m2, 2 milliwatt/m2, 5 milliwatt/m2 were constantly appearing on my meter with occasional higher readings of 12 milliwatt/m2 and 32 milliwatt/m2. So it led me to consider what is it about smart meters that would make it different to what I would be exposed to just walking through the CBD. What is it about smartmeters that I believe is making me very sick with headaches and nausea ?

    1. EMR exposure from smart meter transmisssions are not constant but of a pulsed nature ie. short sharp strong bursts of wireless transmissions lasting a fraction of a second but repeated over and over again all day long. The exposure is in CONTINUOUS REPETETIVE BURSTS.

    2. Smart meter exposure is continuous over the long term (effectively forever), it NEVER STOPS, there is no respite whilst still living in your house and whilst still living in the state of Victoria

    3. Exposure occurs at night time when we are meant to be sleeping and the brain’s pineal gland is meant to perform a host of different functions that are most important to the way we function. One such function I believe is the production of the hormone Melatonin which assists us to maintain our body clock and to sleep properly. It is also acts as a very effective antioxidant (cancer prevention). For the many other benefits of healthy Melatonin production see
    The exposure to microwave pulsing especially at night time can throw this functionality totally out of whack for some people causing all sorts of problems

    4. The EMR exposure levels that one is exposed to all come from a source having it’s own transmission frequency. Smartmeter wireless microwave communications have their own UNIQUE transmitting frequencies that differ depending on the type communication ie. wire mesh network communications or transmissions back to base or possibly some other functions We may be talking about 900 Mhz and 2.4 Ghz and possibly some other transmitting frequency…..maybe
    The human brain and the nerves (ie. the neurological system) is an electrical system and even the human heart is reliant on this electrical system to stimulate it’s beating correctly. A pacemaker is in fact an electrical device to perform the functionality that the body’s own electrical system may no longer be doing. Smart meter frequencies specifically will have their own unique way of engaging activity in the neurological system of particular individuals in a detrimental way.

    5. Considering the four points above one can see that it is erroneous to try and quantify the harm done by a smart meter purely by the strength (power density) of the EMR exposure. The statement used by the government representative bodies that the meters are safe because they are within standards is totally absurd and meaningless. Firstly the standards referred to are ridiculously high (they are actually cooking standards ie. body heating effects) Brain cancers are not a heating effect

    6. In considering the first 4 points above, it makes sense that each individual will have their own limits to what they can be exposed to in this manner (it’s not just about signal strength) before they demonstrate ill effects. Thus it is understandable that some individuals would show immediate ill effects to smart meter transmissions exposures and others would appear not to. Electrosensitivity is very real. The fact that people appear to react differently when exposed to wireless communications from smartmeters only supports the legitimacy of electrosensitivity as a genuine condition.

  2. Anonymous says:

    No freedom, no morals only $$$$ + emty “concerns” for health + environment

  3. Elizabeth says:

    …………………..Health Canada is cherry picking the studies they include for the Safety Code 6 decisions. They include ONLY studies that support their own conclusions. This is NOT how science is conducted………..(Dr Havas).

    This is exactly how science is now conducted! Big corporations fund the studies and if the researchers do not provide the results these Big corporations have paid for, then the researchers will skew the results to find no adverse reactions or No Evidence of Harm!

    The saying “No evidence of harm” is constantly used and I always say- No Evidence of Safety!

  4. Bren says:

    Would you believe that when i sent this information to an retired engineer who follows the government line and he did not give this article any credence at all……what brainwashing from past learning, … what an unscientific approach from this person! New thoughts not allowed.

  5. Laurie says:

    Hi. I live in Canada. It is a travesty to be irradiated on a daily basis because there are no legitimate safety standards here. Cell towers, wifi in most malls and shopping centers, and schools. Unbelievable. I always thought that this was a civilized place to live. Now I realize that it would be far healthier to live in an uncivilized area of the world.

  6. brian Walker says:

    Meter Sample Testing is a Smart Meter Scammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

  7. melb person says:

    It’s a no brainer if you ask me! personally i dont need wireless technology, my happiness was better with out all the interuptions before it all came out. All this radiation floating around could cause a serious epidemic. Who will be respondsible then?

  8. Rik says:

    I don’t get it?
    What does heating have to do with radio waves and frequencies that affect us?
    When people live with or near Smart Meters they have real health problems and none of that has anything to do with heat.
    Who makes up these reports? I’m guessing someone thats getting paid a heap from the people trying to cover it all up.

  9. Steve says:

    The same holds true for Australia’s RF standards maintained by ARPANSA. There is no consideration for non thermal effects or long term chronic exposures. I wrote a very long letter to ARPANSA’s CEO late last year providing a critical review of our RF standards and how they are not fit for purpose to providing long term health assurances. They provide thermal protection against acute exposures only. Our RF “cooking standards” are at best useful for research purposes only.
    I also sent a list of questions to ARPANSA with my letter. Not one of my questions was answered when I received an email response from Dr Larsson (CEO of ARPANSA).
    However there was one statement in his response that appeared to be promising in that ARPANSA is currently reviewing the latest research on this controversial topic. I do not however believe we are likely to see a change in stance by ARPANSA because the implications on the industry would be enormous, particularly if any revisions to our standards require substantial changes (reductions) to the power density of RF emissions from cell phones and towers. Unfortunately money talks and we have a Government that appears to be corporatised, public complaints on this issue appear to fall on deaf ears. ACMA is the government body that regulates our RF standards but also make money from Telecom industry by providing access to the various RF Bands. If that is not a conflict of interest I don’t know what is!!!
    It should be noted that India late last year revised their RF standards down by 90% from their original standard that was based on the levels advised by ICNIRP (which is what our standards are based on). It would seem India is more consciously aware of the dangers of RF (microwaves) than our own Government and RF standards body.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s