French court orders removal of man’s smart meter

He had been suffering from headaches which he claims were due to electro-sensitivity triggered by the Linky [smart] meter

27 December 2023

Linky smart meter   Pic: pixinoo / Shutterstock

By Richard Henshell

A man who claimed to be suffering from headaches due to his Linky meter has won a court battle to have it removed.

Joseph Cascina from Saint-André-le-Puy (Loire) reported hearing a “constant whistling” in his head after its installation.

“All day, all night… Every evening I had to take a pill to get to sleep, life had become hell,” he told France 3.

“When I left my home, the whistling stopped within an hour. And at my in-laws’ house, where there is no Linky meter, I didn’t hear it either. But when I got back home, within a quarter of an hour, the sound started again.”

Mr Cascina, who had reported no symptoms prior to the Linky meter’s installation, asked Enedis to remove it. When the company refused, he took them to court in January 2023.

The court in Saint-Etienne noted that Mr Cascina was suffering, and ruled that the meter should be removed.

The ruling was based on the court’s interpretation of the European Court of Justice’s ‘Principle of precaution’. 

This states that “in case of doubt as to the cause or extent of harm to individuals, institutions can require protective measures without waiting for the reality of the risks to be fully established.”

Enedis replaced Mr Cascina’s Linky meter with an older model, but appealed, aware that many opponents to Linky meters could act upon the decision.

However, on November 28 the Court of Appeal in Lyon upheld the original ruling.

The court’s decision was celebrated by the Stop Linky 5G collective, which opposes the mandatory installation of Linky meters.

“The three judges ruled that the court was faced with symptoms that are justifiable,” said spokesperson Denis Nicolier. “Enedis, which has a public service mission, must protect users in the context of the Principle of precaution.”

Linky meters, which were first introduced in 2018, have been fitted in more than 90% of households. People who do not want one in their home must pay a surcharge, however the ruling on health grounds makes Mr Cascina exempt from this.

What is electromagnetic hypersensitivity?

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) was recognised as a handicap in France in 2015. 

“The symptoms are varied: headaches, chronic fatigue, rashes, concentration problems and more,” Professor Luc Fontana of the University Hospital of Saint-Étienne told France 3.

“The challenge is in ascribing these symptoms to the syndrome, since initially, one must be careful to check they are not due to another health problem.”

In a 2005 report, the World Health Organisation said that the symptoms are “certainly real”, but added that “there is no scientific basis to link EHS symptoms to electromagnetic field exposure.”

An estimated 5% of the population, or 3.5 million people in France could be affected by the syndrome, according to a 2018 report by France’s National Social Security Administration, ANSES.

Many such people are already members of groups that oppose Linky meters in France, including the Stop Linky 5G collective, which hopes that the court’s decision will help spread awareness about the condition.

“The real value here is that doctors and judges worked together to study a typical case of electromagnetic hypersensitivity and look for answers,” Mr Nicolier said.

Source: The Connexion

Posted in Smart Meter | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Doctors, Lawyers, and Scientists Join Together in International Children’s Declaration for the Digital Age

NEW YORK, Nov. 1, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — An international group of leading lawyers, physicians, physicists, epidemiologists and other children’s health experts have today announced their support for a new International Declaration intended to raise public awareness of three fundamental rights of children which are not adequately being protected: the right to be free from addictive platforms and apps; the right to be free from hazardous radiation from wireless devices; and the right to be free from commercial exploitation of private information.

Children have a fundamental human right to be free from addiction, exposure and exploitation in the digital world.

Children around the world are suffering from digital addiction, radiation exposure and commercial exploitation.
Children around the world are suffering from digital addiction, radiation exposure and commercial exploitation.

The “International Declaration on the Human Rights of Children in the Digital Age,” builds on the 1959 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child and encourage decision makers at all levels of government and education to take immediate steps to safeguard children from potential harm. The Declaration is being promoted by two non-profit organizations, the Broadband International Legal Action Network of California (BBILAN), and Americans for Responsible Technology based in New York.

The Declaration will be presented to the United Nations on World Children’s Day,  20th November.

Abridged from press release.

In addition to the legal, health, scientific experts and child advocates who have signed, signatures from the general public are essential to show strong support. So please EVERYONE sign and share widely! 

To sign – https://www.thechildrensdeclaration.org/become-a-signatory

Declaration text – https://www.thechildrensdeclaration.org/the-declaration 

Posted in Electromagnetic radiation, EMF, EMR | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More than 350,000 smart meters switched remotely to more expensive tariffs

Remember when governments said smart meters would save you money? Remember when nobody believed power companies would use smart meters to remotely control people’s usage or cut their power off involuntarily?

Hundreds of thousands of homes in the United Kingdom with smart meters have been remotely switched to more expensive prepayment plans in the past six years.

Over 350,000 smart meters were remotely switched to repay debt between 2017 and 2023, The Telegraph can reveal.

It comes as Ofgem, the energy regulator, is set to bring in new rules setting a “minimum standard” that limits when firms can forcibly change a customer’s tariff. Campaigners are also calling on the Government to outlaw the practice altogether.

The number of remote switches rose fivefold in the five years to 2021, but dropped 61pc in 2022 to 58,977 from over 152,000 the year before, according to official figures, as the Government stepped in to shield consumers from surging costs by raising the energy price cap and introducing the Energy Price Guarantee.

Britain’s smart meter rollout has been billed as a cost-saver for households by its supporters, but has saddled billpayers with three million “dumb” devices that can no longer submit automatic readings to suppliers.

Energy providers have faced criticism for using smart meters to remotely force indebted customers onto more costly prepayment meters without a warrant, which is required to enter a home and manually install one.

Gillian Cooper, head of energy policy at charity Citizens Advice, said: “As energy bills rocketed last year, far too many people were forced onto a prepayment meter they couldn’t afford to keep topped up – often despite clear evidence they could suffer harm if their credit ran out.

“Ofgem’s code of practice is a much-needed improvement in the protections people have against forced installations, including remote switches…These protections must be in place by winter or history could repeat itself.”

Prepayment tariffs are on average £21 a year more expensive than ordinary meter tariffs, according to Department of Energy Security and Net Zero, which announced this month that it would fund an elimination of prepayment premiums until April 2024, when Ofgem is expected to bring in further measures scrapping them permanently.

In a year marked by the cost of living crisis, 4,914 people on average were remotely switched to prepayment meters every month of 2022, according to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The most remote switches occurred in the three months from July to September, which saw just over 16,758 in total.

Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said: “We know that the majority of smart meter switches to PPM mode take place due to debt. This highlights the need for the Government working with charities and energy firms to develop a ‘help to repay’ scheme for the nation’s surging levels of household energy debt.

“Switching a smart meter to prepayment mode without a customers’ explicit and informed consent is as good as forcing them to self-disconnect… the Government must amend the Energy Bill to ban forced switching to traditional or smart prepayment meters when the legislation comes back to the House of Commons in September.”

While it is not clear what proportion of remote switches since 2017 were involuntary, as opposed to voluntary switches where the customer agrees or requests the change, the quarterly number of switches fell by 40pc on the 2022 average during the first three months of 2023 when the moratorium on forcing PPMs on customers came into effect.

The total number of remote switches between 2017 and the first quarter of 2023 was 354,118, according to Ofgem’s figures.

Households that cannot afford to top up their meter risk being disconnected from their power entirely and suppliers are able to dock outstanding debt from the top ups.

Abridged from: More than 350,000 smart meters switched remotely to more expensive tariffs (msn.com)

Posted in Smart Meter | Leave a comment

United Energy is up to old tricks again

Beware, United Energy in Victoria is still trying to hoodwink their customers into believing they must or need to ‘upgrade’ their analogue meter to a smart meter.

You have the right to say NO!

Here is a copy of their letter:

Here is an example of a response you could use to ensure you keep your trusted, safe and reliable analogue meter:

Posted in Smart Meter, United Energy | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

World EHS Day – 16 June

Friday 16 June is world EHS Day. EHS stands for electromagnetic hyper-sensitivity .

This day is a chance to raise awareness about this large and growing problem of EHS and how to become part of the solution.

EHS derives from environmental pollution and not from a disease from which EHS people suffer. When EHS sufferers spend enough time in an unpolluted environment, their health recovers by itself.

To cure EHS, you don’t need medication, but a healthy environment!

Electromagnetic pollution is not only toxic for EHS, it also weakens the immune defences of the whole population and is a major co-factor in the triggering of various pathologies depending on the fragility of each individual.

This is why the reduction of electrosmog should be a priority public health objective.

The objective of the World EHS Day is not only to highlight the moral and physical suffering of the millions of EHS people already impacted by electromagnetic pollution, but also to warn the rest of the population about a danger they are unaware of.

It is important to take advantage of this Day to reach out to those who are not aware of EHS.

Ideas in how to

-How to show your support for EHS
-Make the invisible EHS visible
-Inform people about electro-hypersensitivity
-Inform people about the health risks generated by electrosmog
-Inform people about prevention and health protection solutions

can be found at the bottom of this website:http://coeursdehs.fr/june-16-2023-world-ehs-day-world-day-of-intolerance-to-electromagnetic-pollution/

Posted in Smart Meter | Tagged , | 2 Comments

AusNet Services reverses decision to charge meter reading fee

Victorian electricity distributor, AusNet Services, has written a subsequent letter to customers who have retained a manually read meter.  It states that, ‘After much consideration, we have decided not to charge a fee for manually reading your meter’ (SSMA emphasis).

AusNet customers have been asked to disregard its previous letter, which stated that a new quarterly fee of $34.80 (excluding GST) for manual meter reads was starting on 1 July 2023.   

It has also apologised for ‘any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused’. 

SSMA is grateful for AusNet’s change of heart on this issue.  However, it is an understatement to suggest that the previous letter merely caused confusion or inconvenience.  

For some Victorians, in particular those who are already struggling to cope in an environment that is increasingly saturated with pulsed microwaves, the introduction of a new levy represented one more assault on a cohort that is already marginalised.  And unlike elsewhere in Australia, Victorians are still denied choice, when it comes to electricity metering.  

 

Previous SSMA post on letter from AusNet Services informing customers of new meter reading fee:
https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2023/03/19/ausnet-services-hits-customers-on-manually-read-meters-with-quarterly-fee/

SSMA’s 2014 submission to Australian Energy Regulator covering manual meter read fees:
ssmas-submission-to-aer.pdf

Posted in Smart Meter | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

AusNet Services hits customers on manually read meters with quarterly fee

It appears that AusNet Services, which is one of the five Victorian power distributors, has lost its moral compass.  According to a letter which it mailed to customers, changes to its manual reading process will result in customers with a manually read meter being charged a quarterly fee of $34.80 (excluding GST) from 1 July 2023.  The letter states that this fee will increase every financial year and will be added to the customer’s power bill.

This money grab is in stark contrast to AusNet’s position in 2016, when it admitted to government that it offered to remove communication modules from functioning meters in very limited circumstances such as hypersensitivity, in response to a question shown on page 21 of its submission.

Why are vulnerable Victorians now being targeted?  According to the 2021 Premises Standards Review of the Disability (Access to Premises – Building) Standards 2010, 22.7% of submissions brought up electromagnetic hypersensitivity.  Although this government review was in relation to access to public buildings, surely it is even more important that people living with electromagnetic hypersensitivity are able to enjoy their homes and gardens, without the added insult to their bodies of pulsed microwaves from smart meters?  The new fee is akin to demanding that wheelchair users pay to access ramps into buildings or that life support customers are charged for specialised energy protection to maintain equipment.  It is not acceptable that customers should have to pay for the privilege of having an electricity meter that confines itself to metering, in order to protect their health.

SSMA has heard a number of distressing stories from our members and supporters in regard to AusNet’s heartlessness in responding to questions about the new fee.  It simply isn’t good enough when a business with a monopoly interest seeks to exploit its position and run roughshod over customers raising legitimate concerns and workarounds.  Customers are able to shop around when entering a contract with an electricity retailer.  There is no such option when dealing with a power distributor.

Electricity consumers in Victoria already suffer from the draconian measures instigated by the Victorian Government in 2006 to facilitate the mandated rollout of smart meters to Victorian households and small businesses.  Those Victorians who were fortunate enough to be able to put in place measures to prevent power distributors from swapping over perfectly good analogue meters for electronic devices that not only fail sooner and sometimes lead to significantly higher power bills, but also provide a means of surveillance and cast a blanket of electro-smog over our environment, are now under fresh assault.  Unlike customers in NSW, QLD, SA, Tas, the ACT and WA, Victorian customers have no automatic right to request a non-communicating smart meter if their analogue meter is replaced or if there is already a transmitting smart meter in place.  Victorian customers also are unable to escape (entirely, according to some reports from interstate) or secure a reduction in the meter reading fee by changing retailers.  This places those Victorians who were able to protect their manually read meter in an untenable position if the only means of protecting their meter is to capitulate to AusNet’s demands.

AusNet is the first of the Victorian power distributors to demand a fee for manually reading meters.  Does this mean that Jemena, United Energy, CitiPower and Powercor are going to follow suit?  

Whilst the Victorian Government’s Advanced Metering Infrastructure Order in Council 2014 laid the groundwork for distributors to charge for manual meter reads, up until now this has not occurred.  In fact, when a manual meter read hasn’t been possible for one reason or another, SSMA members and followers have reported that they have been able to negotiate acceptable workarounds with their retailer. 

This appears to no longer be the case for AusNet customers.  Offers to do self-reads, supported by photos, have been ignored.  This stands in contrast to customers living in NSW, QLD, SA, Tas and the ACT, who fall under the umbrella of the National Energy Retail Rules.  In these jurisdictions, although retailers are required to use their best endeavours to ensure actual readings are usually carried out every three months and at least once per year, customers can provide their own reading if they want.  Although this rule was introduced to reduce the risk of customers being exposed to inaccurately estimated bills where the retailer didn’t obtain a reading, the rule provides clear recognition that customers are capable of doing their own reads. 

Due to being a mandated rollout all Victorian customers have contributed, and continue to contribute, towards so-called Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI).  This applies whether or not a smart meter is in place.  This was spelt out in 2014 by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) in a Final Decision, which states, ‘Further, we are satisfied that each distributor has excluded the costs of manual meter reads from its AMI building block costs … Refusal customers therefore bear all the costs of manual meter fees which the Order intends rather than smart meter customers and which the Victorian Minister’s submission supports.  Those customers will continue to also pay the AMI meter charge, despite not having one’.

The 2015 Auditor-General’s report on the rollout of AMI in Victoria found that there would be no overall benefit to consumers but instead ‘a likely cost of $319 million’, which he recognised might further blow out.  The 2015 review followed an equally scathing review in 2009.  Given this situation, doesn’t charging an obligatory manual reading fee every three months amount to double-dipping by AusNet?  The fee doesn’t even match the lowest fee that is charged elsewhere in Australia for a special meter read, which suggests further profiteering.

SSMA also finds it interesting that, although the quarterly meter-reading fee is being raised by AusNet, a letter sent to its customers states that the fee ‘will be added to your power bill’.  The closing page of AusNet’s Advanced Metering Infrastructure 2015 Charges Revision Application claimed that, ‘If a distributor choses [sic] to levy a manual meter fee, it is required to directly bill customers. That is, the manual meter costs are not passed onto retailers, as per standard industry practice’.  Has this situation changed?  If so, it places an added burden on those customers who might wish to ‘fight the good fight’ against yet another assault on their rights.  Not only will they need to negotiate with AusNet, but it seems they might also have to include their retailer in on the discussions.

Previous SSMA submission covering manual meter read fees:

Previous posts on manual meter read fees:

https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2015/01/01/smart-meter-rebels-enjoy-a-reprieve-from-fines-herald-sun/

https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2014/10/21/manual-meter-reading-fees/

https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2014/09/22/the-australian-energy-regulator-publishes-proposed-2015-advanced-metering-infrastructure-charges-applications/

https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2014/05/17/victorian-minister-russell-northe-moves-a-bill-to-enable-power-distributors-to-charge-consumers-an-additional-fee-for-not-having-a-smart-meter/

Posted in Smart Meter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 19 Comments

Worldwide testimonies about smart meters

Arthur Firstenberg, author of The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life and administrator of International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, recently asked people to email the USA’s New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) about their experiences with smart meters.  

‘Heartbreaking testimonies poured in from around the world. Stories about catastrophic effects on the health and lives of adults, children, the elderly, pets, farm animals, birds, wild animals, insects, worms, plants, neighbours, workers and entire communities.

Below are excerpts and summaries of some of the 271 testimonies that are posted on the public comments page of the PRC’s website…

Jennifer Andree is a New Mexico resident who was severely injured by a smart meter “that has completely devastated my life.” She is a nurse and a veteran who knew nothing about smart meters until she was injured by one. This occurred on Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico. “For three and one-half months,” she writes, she slept with her head approximately one foot away on the other side of a wall from an electrical panel containing two electric smart meters. “Anything that carries an electric current or emits any radiation” now causes her headaches, brain fog, and internal burning. “I can no longer tolerate living in an urban environment,” she writes, “so I have moved to South Dakota, to a cleaner environment in the country. Because of the harms I was exposed to, I am separated from my family, which has contributed to my suffering… I have a nursing license, but can no longer work in my profession.”

Maryann McCabe writes from the UK: “From the time [the smart meter] was turned on, I could not walk around in my flat, I could not write an email, I could not think and I could not sleep. It was an absolute nightmare until it was switched off.”

Harriet Greene, formerly of New Mexico, writes: “I was able to opt out and keep my old meter. Everybody I talk to who was forced to accept smart meters has complained of numerous effects.”

Lauren Bond writes, “Smart meters were installed in my building, and the radiation they emit inside apartments creates for myself, a constant burning pain to my skin.”

Jeanne Thompson writes from California: “My mother died of a massive brain tumor caused by a row of six Smart Meters outside her condo, on the wall where the head of her bed was. We discovered this after she had already passed. You can imagine my shock and horror at that realization.”

Dr. Linda Thomas writes, “I have seen hideous debility in adults and children secondary to Smart Meters being installed in my area.” These include absence seizures in a 2-year-old boy and chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia in his mother.

Mario Desira writes from Malta: “Back in 2017 my electrical meter caught fire and nearly caused a house fire. Luckily I was at home and intervened before anything worse happened.”

Persephone Maywald writes from California that she was diagnosed with suspected Parkinson’s disease a few months after a smart meter was installed, and that she later had the meter replaced and within a few weeks all her symptoms disappeared.

Simone St. Clare writes from California that since a smart meter was installed, there have been almost no hummingbirds at her feeders and a decrease in caterpillars in her garden.

Deirdre Novella writes from New York that her hair started falling out within a few months of a smart meter being installed at her place of work, that she was diagnosed with leukemia, and that she developed a lifelong allergy to electricity.

Sheila Reavill, who works as an electromagnetic radiation specialist (“EMRS”) in Georgia, writes that after smart meters were installed, “the smart meter signature I logged [on her radio frequency meter] in my bedroom was at the precise times I wake up at night”; that her next door neighbor and her neighbor’s daughter wake at the exact same time she does every night; that her border collie began having skin problems and would wake up whimpering at the exact same time also; and that she and her dog both wake up at that same time with diarrhea.

Rebeca Randle writes from California that while she had a smart meter she could not sleep and there were no birds; and that when the smart meter was removed, the birds came back.

Robert Workman, an EMRS in Missouri, writes: “I have confirmed injuries from wireless radiation and the Smart meter seems to be the most damaging to me and my clients. Once the ITRON electronic meter is removed many of my clients have an immediate response to an improved health. This meter has been torture to myself and others in St Louis, it is my professional opinion this meter kills all biological life.”

Health practitioner Diane Peterson writes from California that “For the majority [of people], they suddenly developed symptoms and only later discovered that the symptoms began immediately after the smart meter was installed.”

Sema Kelly writes: “My friend’s neighbor had a smart meter put in. She didn’t know it had such dangers, but soon found out her chickens in the yard had huge tumors growing on their throats and body. The eggs they laid were odd shapes and colors, and the chickens appeared to be tired, which was not ever seen prior to the installments of the smart meters.”

Andre Fayolle writes that a smart meter gave his family headaches, caused the animals, birds and insects to disappear, and caused a fire that burned down his house.

Karen Crenshaw writes from California that she had no knowledge of the dangers of smart meters until an Itron smart meter was installed on her house, after which she awoke abruptly every hour during the night, had uncomfortable ear sensations, acquired high-pitched tinnitus, and felt pressure in her chest.

Annette Lillig writes from the UK: “Everyone I know who [has a smart meter] has been negatively affected by them.”

Beverly Jennings writes: “In Capitola, CA an entire bank of smart meters burst into flames and started a fire and burned down an apartment complex.”

Margaretha Tierney writes from Australia that she became sick two weeks after a smart meter was installed and was sick for five years until she had it moved off her house.

Sarah Wild writes that she had heart palpitations, headache, and panic until her smart meter was removed. She writes that her 80-year-old neighbor “went from being extremely lively, active, outward-going to hobbling around and forgetful within 6 months” of a smart meter being installed and died within 18 months.

Dino DeBenetti writes from Ontario, Canada that after a smart meter was installed, his wife’s health and behavior deteriorated, resulting in their divorce. He also writes that he has attempted to hatch fertile chicken eggs in an incubator in his house twice since the meter was installed, with over 20 fertile eggs each time, and not one egg hatched either time.

Karen Blomquist writes from California that when smart meters were installed on her home she incurred inner ear damage, sleeplessness, anxiety, non-stop heart palpitations, and migraines, and fled her home after two months to save her life. She also reports that her pets all got cancer and passed away.

Tina Cada writes from Florida that although she opted out of a smart meter on her own home, “[o]n the day they were getting installed [in her neighborhood], I walked outside and had no idea where I was. I had the worst kind of disorientation. This reaction was ongoing and lasted for the first few months.” She reports vertigo attacks that have continued, and constant dry mouth, that her teenage son has dry mouth, headaches and sleep disruptions, that her neighbor’s dog suddenly got cancer and died after the smart meters were installed, that her cat started acting differently, and that all the bats disappeared.

Laurie Grams writes from Texas that she lives in an apartment complex and so could not opt out, and has had sleep problems and agitation since smart meters were installed.

Jennifer Wood writes from West Virginia that “I have literally known thousands of people over the past nine years or so who became so ill when smart meters were installed in their homes that they had to move just as I did.”

Elizabeth Foley Walsh writes from North Carolina that she knew nothing about smart meters until after one was installed in her home and she began having severe headaches, dizziness, and temporal lobe seizures the following week. She writes that she thought she was dying until she went camping one week and the symptoms disappeared; that her next door neighbor’s headaches began the same time hers did; that an elderly neighbor across the street began falling repeatedly immediately after their headaches began; and that when she finally moved to a location without a smart meter she “was stunned at the change in my health.” She observed that “the frogs disappeared the very summer after the smart meter went in”—the hundreds of frogs that previously inhabited the creek behind their back yard—and that all the house sparrows and starlings disappeared, and that squirrels were “suddenly tame and suddenly laying down ‘resting’ a lot. They seem to be panting and they seem to be sick.” She writes that she has had to leave an 18-year career in developmental epidemiology.
 
Simone Bercu writes that she and her family left their homes in other states to come to New Mexico five years ago to escape smart meters. “The smart meters were devastating our small children and ourselves and the effects are still noticeable,” she writes.

Rainer Grobe writes that on the same day a smart water meter was installed, his wife developed heart arrhythmia, very high blood pressure, and fainted, and that they had to remove the meter themselves, with both legal and financial consequences.

Kent Casady writes from Germany that he and his wife purchased a house with a smart meter, and when they moved in there were no insects, bees, butterflies or birds, and “[t]he dirt in the yard was dead.” After they had the smart meter removed, they had “earthworms in the soil, bees, butterflies, hummingbirds, spiders, and other creatures.”

Kimberly Webber, in Taos, New Mexico, writes that although they were able to opt out of a smart meter at their home, they were unable to opt out at their place of business, and that “[w]e noticed agitation, irritability, depression, head aches, ear ringing and other symptoms from ourselves and our employees while in the work space.” They moved their business to a new location without a smart meter and “[a]ll of the symptoms have disappeared for us and our team.”

Ellen Habeck writes: “Until I researched the matter, I could not understand why I had such fragmented sleep, and would wake with severe tachycardia. I thought my heart would beat out of my chest. There was not sleep and no ability to function well in the morning after that.” Finally, “I looked and found the place I had moved to had a smart meter outside the bedroom wall.” She adds: “There is a neighbor who asked me why she thought she would feel unwell when working for hours in a particular room in her house. She also noted that any plants she put in that room died, where they had been thriving in other rooms. I looked and saw there was a smart meter directly on the other side of the wall of that room where she sat, and a neighbor’s smart meter pointing at fairly close proximity to that room.”

Arlene Griffin is a Santa Fe resident who briefly lived in southern California in 2019-2020. She writes: “I had no history of heart problems, but upon moving into a house in a development in San Diego County, I was jolted awake every night, feeling like what it would be like to be hit with defibrillator paddles. Once awake, my heart would alternate between pounding, racing, and skipping beats for the rest of the night, and I would shake for hours. I also developed eye issues—my eyes burned and were red and swollen. Each day I would feel better when I left our house, but each night the horrible symptoms would return. It was terrifying and exhausting… We hired an inspector who tested our house for RF/EMF radiation and found that the high readings were not coming from our property (we had an analog meter), but from our neighbor’s house. It so happened that her meter directly faced our bedrooms… Finally, in September 2020 I returned to New Mexico for good, and I have not had those heart symptoms here.”

Stephanie Dickerson writes from North Carolina that she is “currently suffering every single day and especially nights from the newly installed” smart meters in her neighborhood, and that “I have been forced from 3 previous home locations because of smartmeter installations… My heart rate has become dangerously high, my body temperature can not regulate, I experience constant vibrating in my torso and in my legs, my brain function has deteriorated and I can not sleep at all. This physical response to the newly installed smartmeters is life-threatening to me.”

Brenda Rogers writes from California that she “had to leave my home in a camper to find somewhere I could sleep” because of a smart meter, and that she had to abandon her home of 30 years.

Catherine Ralston lives in Taos. “A smart meter was put in at my address,” she writes. “I started having trouble sleeping at night. I started having headaches. I stopped waking up happy. My emotions were flatline. This happened quickly, over a couple of weeks. Someone told me about symptoms showing up in people after smart meters were installed where they live. I went looking for the smart meter. Then I moved my bed to a location in the building as far from the meter as I could put it, and slept with my head at the end of the bed furthest from the meter location. I slept through the night, and woke with no headache. I do not own the property and the owner won’t work with the electric company to give back the old meter. I feel blessed someone told me about the horrible impact the smart meters have on human health.”

Glenn Kikel moved to New Mexico from Colorado. He writes that when a smart meter was installed on their Colorado house, he developed tinnitus and his wife developed heart palpitations, and that both health problems ceased when the meter was moved.

Diane Craig writes that she “experienced severe tinnitus, tremors, short-term memory issues, and an area at the back of my neck at the base of my skull that was hot to my husband’s touch” in a 4-hour period after a smart meter was installed 10 feet beyond the head of her bed. They paid for opt-outs for both themselves and a neighbor in order to be well, she writes.

Annie Mattingly, of Santa Fe, writes, “My daughter, living in another state, was away when a Smart Meter was installed on her house. Within days of her healthy arrival home, she became ill and now, several years later, she is still plagued with health issues and is only partially functional.”

M. L. writes from Pennsylvania: “When our meter started transmitting, I noticed two birds that had died within approximately 25 feet of it.”

Lukas Zillmer writes: “I have personal experience of bad sleep, waking up at night, waking up still tired from being exposed to the radiation by smart meters which made life almost unbearable.”

Simone Prince writes from British Columbia, Canada that her cat developed hyperthyroidism when a smart meter was installed on her townhouse, and that she herself changed from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism at the same time.’  

Abridged from Cellular Phone Task Force newsletter, Worldwide testimonies about smart meters, January 5, 2023, available at: https://cellphonetaskforce.org/newsletters/

Posted in Smart Meter | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

‘5G – An Undeniable Risk’ webinar available online

The video of the recent US-based Zoom forum, 5G – An Undeniable Risk, featuring Dr. Paul Héroux, Dr. Kent Chamberlin, Dr. Sharon Goldberg, Frank Clegg and Andrew Campanelli, Esq. is now available for everyone to watch.

Please share widely. This was a power-packed event that brought a group of brilliant panellists together.

The 85-minute video, along with presentation material, can be accessed on Americans for Responsible Technology’s website at:

https://www.americansforresponsibletech.org/5gwebinar

Posted in 5G | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Zoom Forum | 5G – An Undeniable Risk

Stop Smart Meters Australia members and supporters are invited to join the following US-based forum on 5G risks.

With its impressive line-up of speakers, the forum promises to be highly informative and engaging.

Note that the time of the forum for residents in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney is 9.30 AM, Wednesday, 26 October 2022.

Click here to register for the Zoom forum.

A PDF copy of the 5G forum flyer is available here.

Posted in 5G | Tagged , , | 1 Comment