State-approved deception program – What is the QLD Government hiding?

Queensland Department of Energy and Water Supply has euphemistically renamed ‘Smart Meters’ as ‘Digital Meters’ in its webpage on digital meters.  It is only the smaller print which reveals that these ‘digital’ meters also “feature remote communications for reading, and other services”.

The Department of Energy and Water Supply webpage states that “new national metering rules are expected to come into effect on 1 December 2017, making digital meters the standard meter for all customers. This means that whenever a new meter is installed, a digital meter will be the default option. However, in limited circumstances, customers in existing premises may opt-out of having a digital meter”.

See: Queensland Department of Energy and Water Supply

Referring to wireless smart meters as ‘digital meters’ is misleading.  Of course all communications-enabled smart meters are digital meters, but NOT ALL digital meters have a radiofrequency communications chipset on board, as will be occurring in Queensland.

Does the Queensland Government fear people will be more inclined to opt-out of having a so-called ‘digital’ meter if they are fully aware of what they are being offered: a wireless device that emits pulsed radiation every day, 24 hours per day?  See Technical study reveals magnitude of Victorian smart meter transmissions for just how many times per day Queenslanders can expect to be blasted with radiation.

If not, why has the Queensland Government stooped to engaging in, what appears to be, deliberate deception?

 

 

This entry was posted in Smart Meter and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to State-approved deception program – What is the QLD Government hiding?

  1. LolzBot says:

    Wrap the meter in tinfoil and watch the sparks fly!!

  2. Nathan Brewer says:

    These are the filthy aggressive thuggish people hired by Victoria’s Five Electricity Distribution to coerce and intimidate Victorian Residents to allow a forceful installation of this filthy harmful smart meter transmitting device against their will and without their informed consent.

    This thug who bashed this innocent elderly gentleman should be jailed for twenty years or perhaps should just be impaled. The Energy Company that he was working for should be brought to account and perhaps stripped of their retailing license. I’m sure that compaby can be identified.

    http://tenplay.com.au/news/melbourne/2016/8/18/bashed-by-salesman

    https://au.news.yahoo.com/video/watch/32375836/grandfather-bashed-beaten-punched-by-door-to-door-electricity-salesman/#page1

    • Anonymous says:

      Here is the person responsible for this cowardly act. Give him 20 years I say. And give the CEO’s of the Five Electricity Distribution Companies life imprisonment for their heinous act of commissioning their own thugs to forcefully install these harmful and carcinogen transmitting devices onto private property without the informed consent of the owner/occupants. This bloke deserves to be caned 100 times in the true and cruel Singaporean style of caning. And I would love to know which retail company this punk was representing.

      http://www.msn.com/en-au/video/tech/pushy-door-to-door-salesman-charged-over-attack-on-an-elderly-man/vi-BBvO3mg?refvid=CC4cF6

      This bloke acted no differently to United Energy’s hitman who came to be known as Frank Sinatra being the name he gave our friend Darren when asked to identify himself when seen on Darren’s property. You stupid clown Frank, your actions have certainly not been forgotten and I hope that you and your commander at the time Hugh Gleeson are soon locked up in prison hopefully like this punk will be for many many years you thugs. You too Paul Adams and Nino Ficca. And let’s not forget our friend now sloshing himself in his Geelong vineyard. Nor our friend Scott Parker who literally went to the dogs and who once threatened the people of Victoria in the Leader media with such intimidatory remarks saying that Jemena could well use the forced entry method to install their poisonous transmitters onto the property of “refusers”. How they could be allowed to employ such poisonous technology is beyond me especially when you consider that the communication module in Jemena’s device is “integrated” as part of the device ie. you cant physically remove it. In other words the device itself is a transmitter. Hardly what you could legitimatly consider as being “metrology” or “metering” equipment is it ? How did they get away with being allowed to deploy these mini phone towers on private land is beyond me other than to say by the greatest swindle and act of deception in all of Australian History.

    • Gwen says:

      Thank you for the links Nathan. Totally agree with everything you say. Horrifying account though.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Any Distribution Company that would forcefully install these harmful devices onto private property without proper informed (and NOT implied) consent from all of the owners/occupants/local residents deserve to be stripped of their license to distribute electricity in Australia.

  4. Bill says:

    This is now indisputable health impacting radio transmission equipment being set up on private property whilst being misrepresented as a mere metering device.

    How very very deceitful that is.

  5. John Barton says:

    I understand these digital meters are even worse than the Victorian smart meters as they have 5 Watt transceivers compared to 1 Watt in the Victorian meter as each of these Digital meters transmits back to base in its own right, rather than via a low power signal into the mesh

  6. Anonymous says:

    Proper Naming
    ——————-

    The Queensland Department of Energy and Water Supply have actually done the right thing. These harmful devices are not smart and neither are they meters. Nothing can be called smart that causes the extent of harm that these devices do cause. The Queensland authorities have obviously recognised. They obviously also acknowledge that this device is not a metrology device and that it would be most incorrect to refer to such device as a “meter”.

    For that same reason, their choice of the term Digital Meter is also not really correct. If I may make to them some suggestions for legitimate naming of their device…….

    1. Digital Radio Transmitter.
    2. Digital Microwave Radio Transmitter.
    3. Home wiring resistance test device.
    4. Harmonic induced home wiring resistance test device.

    These devices are actually quite a good diagnostic tool to find out if there are any weaknesses in your home wiring. Here is one example of a positive test result obtained in Yarraville.
    https://stopsmartmeters.com.au/2015/07/03/can-smart-meters-cause-house-fires/
    Thanks to this device this gentleman was able to find out that his home wiring was starting to get a little bit old. Now he can take steps to replace it knowing that it does need to be replaced.

    As far as the issue of EHS sensitive people is concerned, these devices are very versatile, carrying a highly effective EHS diagnosis functionality module. Any practioner looking for a reliable method to test patients for EHS sensitivity should get one of these. The Queensland Government could quite legitimately use a very appropriate fifth naming option for the device being

    5. EHS Tester

    And for those researchers looking to discover what type of long term effects exposure to non ionising radiation can have upon a population, these devices are fantastic research tools. They transmit microwave pulses every few seconds for every minute and every hour of the day on a 24/7 basis 365 days of the year and they are very reliable because they will just keep on transmitting and never stop. The beauty is that these transmissions will go right through the body every time. It means that these researchers will have access to an abundant pool of meaningful data in Victoria and Queensland which they can examine at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 year intervals. I’m pretty sure that this data will provide them with meaningful results.

  7. Mariella says:

    They can’t try Victoria’s implied consent strategy to install because that is now well and truly exposed as being installation by thuggery. So the next best thing is the default strategy ie. installation by default. Once again it is an installation by stealth. The Queensland government is just as corrupt as the Victorian government it seems.

  8. Dasher Kyles says:

    The only way a smart meter aka digital meter will be installed on anyone’s home in Queensland will be if that owner/occupant allows it. There’s no other way. That’s the truth. In essence it’s no different to here in Victoria. The only difference is the song that plays in the background. One set of lyrics says you must have it. The other set says you don’t have to have it. It’s all being sung to the same music. The agenda is there to install these harmful *@$T@RD devices throughout Australia. Only you can say no and must say no. Implied consent is now freely being used to implement every evil scheme imaginable. Australia you’ve sold your soul.

  9. Gwen says:

    This is the link to a story on the sale (lease) of the N.S.W. power grid. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/11/scott-morrison-blocks-ausgrid-sale-on-national-security-grounds The Lateline program was on 11th August 2016

  10. Gwen says:

    On Lateline tonight, there was a discussion re. the bid by China for the lease of the N.S.W. electricity grid being rejected by the Australian government because of national security concerns. Mention was made of smartmeters as having made the grid vulnerable. Amazing that this conversation wasn’t censored.

  11. Anonymous says:

    They have to define what standard means. We all have different definitions. They can’t decide for you. This will just be another disaster and eventually they will have the same problems like we do in Victoria. The people are the Government, when did they decide they would have to have smart meters? Or is it the corporate Government that is trying to decide for them. Trying to force goods and services on the people without consent carries penalties. The law states in Victoria, i am not sure in Queensland but i would assume they have something similar.
    Section 178BA of the Crimes Act states:

    Whosoever by any deception dishonestly obtains for himself or herself or another person any money or valuable thing or any financial advantage of any kind whatsoever shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.

  12. Rob Simpson says:

    The Silent, Invisible 21st Century Killer by Design: Weaponized Cell Towers and Cellphones http://empireexposed.blogspot.com.au/  +61 3 8711 82320432 036 042 rsaustr@yahoo.com.au To watch my Quest for the Mahogany Ship video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_FOkhnL4Go  

  13. Anonymous says:

    This disease of evil politicians has spread right thru the nation

  14. Sam Reynard says:

    After what’s happened in Victoria, if the Queensland Government was to use terminology revealing that these b@$tard devices are actually “smart meters, they wouldn’t have a hope in hell of getting any of these devices installed.

  15. Dusan says:

    Yes “Digital Meters”………..just like any other electronic meter…….safe as houses aren’t they…..

  16. Trish sworth says:

    I would just like to let you know that AGL in The Tillgillery Pensula Area of NSW is also currently rolling out so-called Digital Meters which are replacing existing meters! Being installed starting from next Monday 15th August for about 10 days.

    Regards Trish

    Sent from my iPhone

    • Anonymous says:

      They still need consent from the customer.Trish, they also need to disclose how they are going to read your meter. They also need to disclose if they are safe and prove it if asked as well. Just because they say something does not mean you can’t say no. They would also be responsible and liable if these digital meters caused harm or fires.
      But if people can’t be bothered saying no then they will get them in.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s