An Open Letter To ARPANSA In Response To Their Media Statement

Recently the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) – the Australian Government body responsible for the standards and guidelines regulating the rollout for 5G in Australia – published Misinformation about Australia’s 5G network.

(To publish such a statement, ARPANSA must be feeling the heat from community backlash and the growing volume of evidence delineating the negative biological and health effects of electromagnetic radiation.)

In response to the ARPANSA statement, an Open Letter to ARPANSA concludes with Professor Martin Pall’s summarisation that:

“With 100% consistency, ARPANSA avoids all of the strongest available science in this area.

With 100% consistency, ARPANSA has produced a stunningly biased document, whose positions are repeatedly and consistently contradicted by the strongest science and by large numbers of independent scientists.

With 100% consistency, ARPANSA has failed to protect the health and safety of the people of Australia.

With 100% consistency, ARPANSA has protected the economic interests of the telecommunications industry.”

A copy of the Open Letter refuting ARPANSA’s dubious claims can be found at: An Open Letter To ARPANSA In Response To Their Press Statement


This entry was posted in Smart Meter and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to An Open Letter To ARPANSA In Response To Their Media Statement

  1. Sandy says:

    Well it seems to me we have foxes guarding the hen houses?
    Any way, all in cahoots!

  2. Helen Murphy says:

    ………..and the shame called ARPANSA continues…

  3. Richard Giles says:

    Good work, Richard

  4. Tanja Price says:

    Any thoughts on maybe taking ARPANSA to court? I wonder if that would be something worthwhile discussing with Raymond? Yes, they are hiding behind their disclaimer, however, by openly misinforming and misleading the public – and our politicians – with what Professor Pall calls fraudulent statements, I think it’s time to take them to task?

    Cheers, Tanja


  5. pcwwp says:

    Yes they are a paid up part of the corporates – we must stop this crime..

  6. maggie augello-luke says:

    Thank you for this! It helps a lot to have the information. Can you please tell me why the open letter goes to a business website? Jessie Reimers – get a fresh start? doesn’t make sense, so thought I’d let you know. Thanks Maggie


Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s