If you would like to be on ARPANSA’s Electromagnetic Radiation Health Complaints Register, please download the standard reporting form available on this page .
If you would like to join the Australian National Register of Environmental Sensitivities (ANRES), in order to register your sensitivities on the ANRES register, go to ANRES.
If you would like to connect with Electrosensitivity Australia (ES-Au), a community group that is dedicated to raising awareness of electrosensitivity and which advocates for national recognition of EHS in Australia as a functional impairment/disability, go to:
The evidence attesting to the potential of wireless technologies to cause substantial adverse health effects continues to grow. Thousands of independent, peer-reviewed scientific studies have accumulated over decades – and are now accumulating at an accelerating pace – that document adverse health and neurological impacts of EMF/RF. Links to recent studies, sworn statements, reports, videos, and more, follow.
This 10-minute video, explains very clearly why the industry scientists, utilities, and some governments, can’t substantiate their claims that smart meters are safe. They use cherry-picking or incomplete evidence to support their claims, opposed to a proper examination of evidence, also known as falsifiability. Please forward to your local journalist, policy maker, lawyer, and scientists.
Use this video to demonstrate why neither utilities, industry scientists, nor government can claim and prove that smart meters are safe.
Talking to your doctor about electro-hypersensitivity or radiowave sickness symptoms – please print this text talkingtoyourdoctor and take it to your doctor or medical centre if they fail to acknowledge your condition due to lack of knowledge, awareness, or other reasons.
The 2012 BioInitiative Report reviewed more than 1,800 new scientific studies, further to the 2007 BioInitiative Report, which cited over 2,000 scientific studies, documenting adverse health effects of EMF-RF radiation below existing guidelines and standards.
Navy_Radiowave_Brief or the 1971 Research Report and Bibliography on Biological Phenomena (‘effects’) and Clinical Manifestations attributed to microwave and radio-frequency radiation, by Dr Glasser and the Naval Medical Research Institute, also cited more than 2,000 studies documenting the effects.
radio_wave_sickness_studies_units – an overview of the radiowave sickness symptoms and biological effects of radio waves by ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG, President, Cellular Phone Taskforce, September 2001.
AndrewGoldsworthyWitnessStatement – Dr Andrew Goldsworthy documents and explains the mechanisms involved in the damaging or adverse biological effects of non-ionising electromagnetic radiation, including that from cell phones and Wi-Fi.
Biol-Effects-EMFs-2012-NZ2 – Biological effects of weak EMF explained and documented.
McMurtry_Evidence_Prudent-Health-EMF – the evidence is strongest for leukemia from electricity-frequency fields and for brain tumours from communication-frequency fields.
Dr Tresidder – Electrosensitivity / Electromagnetic Sensitivity symptoms, condition, and appeal to other medical practitioners.
Public_Health_-_EMF – report by Dr Genuis on more convincing studies showing environmental health is not sufficiently emphasised and addressed in medical education explaining why many clinicians and even more physicians are not aware of the irrefutable scientific proof of harm from non-ionising radiation.
Paul Brodeur testimony – a testimony from a novelist and award-winning reporter, former investigative journalist for The New Yorker, who built a career out of exposing the environmental hazards and health risks created by industry.
Convincing studies and anlysis of adverse effects_EMR and RF Health – overview by Dr Neil Cherry.
IRCHET International Research Centre of Healthy and Ecological Technology Germany – more studies documenting adverse biological and health effects of EMF and RF.
The 1970 NASA report on Microwave Radiation Effects on the Organism of Man and Animals.
US UTILITY PG&E BEGINS REMOVING ‘SMART’ METERS DUE TO HEALTH EFFECTS
Public health implications of wireless technologies Abstract: Global exposures to emerging wireless technologies from applications including mobile phones, cordless phones, DECT phones, WI-FI, WLAN, WiMAX, wireless internet, baby monitors, and others may present serious public health consequences. Evidence supporting a public health risk is documented in the BioInitiative Report. New, biologically based public exposure standards for chronic exposure to low-intensity exposures are warranted. Existing safety standards are obsolete because they are based solely on thermal effects from acute exposures. The rapidly expanding development of new wireless technologies and the long latency for the development of such serious diseases as brain cancers means that failure to take immediate action to reduce risks may result in an epidemic of potentially fatal diseases in the future. Regardless of whether or not the associations are causal, the strengths of the associations are sufficiently strong that in the opinion of the authors, taking action to reduce exposures is imperative, especially for the fetus and children. Such action is fully compatible with the precautionary principle, as enunciated by the Rio Declaration, the European Constitution Principle on Health (Section 3.1) and the European Union Treaties Article 174.
——————————————————————————————-This document by Dr. Karl Maret, commenting on the California Council on Science and Technology Report “Health Impacts of Radio Frequency from Smart Meters”, assisted with reversing California’s policy: http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/docs/letters/Maret_-_CCST_Commentary_1-31-2011_final.pdf
Assessment of Radiofrequency Microwave Radiation Emissions from Smart Meters: http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/
Electro-sensitivity information: ES-UK Newsletters. In addition to numerous other health problems, electromagnetic pollution has been associated with an increase in the number of individuals suffering from a condition known as electrohypersensitivity (EHS). EHS is defined by the World Health Organization as: “…a phenomenon where individuals experience adverse health effects while in the vicinity of devices emanating electric, magnetic, or electromagnetic fields.” Read more here http://www.weepinitiative.org/talkingtoyourdoctor.pdf
We Are The Evidence, a website founded by attorney Dafna Tachover, highlights the human face of suffering caused by wireless technology.
Australian Smart Meter Revolt:
A Current Affair, 14 March, 2012
Exploding smart meters and homeowners forced to flee home due to adverse health effects.
Biological And Health Effects Of Microwave Radio Frequency Transmissions, A Review Of The Research Literature, 2013, is an excellent 74-page review of 279 biomedical research publications. It was prepared by a group of physicians and other professionals with scientific and engineering expertise over a 16-month period for the Eugene Water and Electric Board, who were considering installing smart meters.
Victorian Stories sent in to us.